The OTL DIY Page

OTL Amps with the EL/PL509/519 (6KG6/40KG6)

 

Home

Advanced DIYers - I hope you'll enjoy this page. Newbie? Please read Disclaimer.

Feb 15, 2003: a new page - OTL Projects. First instalment:

* Two New Complete OTL Power Amp Projects! *

 

Some OTL speculations and calculations

1    Single End CF Class A into 8 Ohms (Vp 75V, Vg1 ~-12V, Vg2 150V, Ik 500mA/EL509)

No. of EL509s/channel:                     1 pc         2 pcs         3 pcs         4 pcs         5 pcs         6 pcs

Pdiss tot (HT + heater, 6-38V across CS3): 56W        119W       188W       263W        344W        432W

Pout continuous @ clip:                        1W           4W           9W          16W          25W          36W

Efficiency (of o-p stage incl. heater):        1.8%         3.4%         4.8%       6.1%         7.3%          8.3%

                                                                                        Who ever said SE Class A OTLs were efficient?!

Figures are for "generic" EL509/6KG6s. The 40-volt/ 0.3-ampere ‘PL’ and 40KG6 versions draw 0.6W less per valve.

 

A Tentative Single-Ended Circuit to Try

Each EL509 grid has its own 1uF/100k combo, bias circuit is common. Heaters are  in series from GND to B–. Don’t forget grid- and gate-stoppers (not shown for clarity): 100-300R for small valves and 10-100k for ‘509s and MOSFETs (I'd use something like the IRF710 for the screen reg.). For all versions, adjust NFB to exactly 10x/20dB, except 1W amp 11.8x/21.5dB. Sorry, I haven't calculated the feedback voltage divider for any version yet - just keep them in the range of a few k Ohms. The 22k resistor is 2W min., the 1 Ohm 3W. FETs can have 1-1.5 megohm divider resistors. The power supply (see below) must be substantial, but need not be regulated. The current sources/sinks need substantial heat sinks, especially CS3, but I leave the calculations to you (The formula [0C/W spec.]=25/[U*I] gives a theoretical sink temp. of 500C - it's always higher in practice...). 

                  


For details of  DC Servo and Output Protection Circuit, see Headphone Amp Project. Use a powerful relay. They're NOT optional here, as you don't want C3 to pull 0.5-3A (that's 4-24V!!!) from GND through your speaker at start-up or if a failure occurs! Unless the heaters are pre-heated, the speaker will blow, that's almost a promise!

 

Power Supply (one channel)

               

Front-end heater PS is not included above - see Tips and Tricks, section 3 for advice. Tip if you use the 40V PL509: strap the heaters in series pairs across the 80V B+ instead. More pairs in parallel. A bigger xfmr is needed, but the B- xfmr can be smaller to compensate. It is a very good idea to start up heaters a couple of minutes before applying B+.

 

Current sources 

See Tips and Tricks, section 4! Use the cascode variety for plate loads and the MOSFET for cathodes. For CS3, a MOSFET or an IC voltage regulator hooked up as a current reg. could be used for the smaller amps. For the bigger, one or more big MOSFETs like IRFP150 are also necessary. Cascoding may be a good idea here, as big MOSFETs have big output capacitance. Maybe like this? (Note that an extra few B- volts may be necessary for the 1-9W amps. A series resistor for the heater string may be needed, but this is a good thing.) 
[Perhaps the ideal CS3 current source would be another EL509. Note that this would have to work at a much higher voltage than the MOSFET, so the best solution would be to use a bipolar +/- supply with equal rail voltages (+/- 80-120V or so). The valve-CS3 screen grid could be fed off the positive supply rail via a dropping resistor, or better, series regulator, and decoupled to B-. This variant should give far less offset at startup. A nice way of soft-starting the amp could be to have a pot or special circuit that after a delay for heating slowly brings up the screen-reg. voltages simultaneously.]

               

 

Suggested Configurations  

           CS1: 10mA     CS2: 20mA     CS3: 500mA     B–: 6.3V

           Sensitivity: 0.3Vrms     Zout: 2.9 Ohm

          CS1: 10mA     CS2: 20mA     CS3: 1A     B–: 12.6V

          Sensitivity: 0.42Vrms     Zout: 1.7 Ohm

          CS1: 10mA     CS2: 20mA     CS3: 1.5A     B–: 18.9V

          Sensitivity: 0.55Vrms     Zout: 1.1 Ohm

           CS1: 20mA     CS2: 40mA     CS3: 2.0A     B–: 25.2V

           Sensitivity: 1.0Vrms     Zout: 0.85 Ohm

           CS1: 20mA     CS2: 40mA     CS3: 2.5A     B–: 31.5V

           Sensitivity: 1.2Vrms     Zout: 0.7 Ohm

           CS1: 20mA     CS2: 40mA     CS3: 3.0A     B–: 37.8V (hint: a  0.2oC/W at 100W heat sink is required for CS3!)

           Sensitivity: 1.35Vrms     Zout: 0.55 Ohm

*Alternatives for input valve: 6BU6, 7E6, or 6C4; 6C5, 6J5 or 7A4; ½12AU7 or ½7AF7; ½6FQ/CG7, ½6SN7 or ½7N7.

 

2.1    Push Pull CF Class AB into 8 Ohms (Vp 150V, Vg1 -35V, Vg2 190V, Ik 220mA)

No. of EL509 pairs/channel:                 1 pair         2 pairs         3 pairs         4 pairs

Pdiss tot (incl. heater):                               92W         184W           276W         368W

Pout Class AB:                                           12W          49W             110W         196W

[Pout Class A:                                            0.8W         3.0W            7.0W          12.4W]

Efficiency Class AB:                                 13%           26.6%          39.8%         53.3%

 

2.2    Push Pull CF Class AB into 8 Ohms (Vp 110V, Vg1 –33V?, Vg2 205V, Ik 330mA; g2 feed-forward driven, see below)

No. of  EL509 pairs/channel:                         1 pair             2 pairs             3 pairs

Pdiss tot (incl. heater):                                    110W            220W             330W

Pout Class AB:                                                 14.5W           57.8W            130W

[Pout Class A:                                                  1.74W           7.0W              15.7W]

Efficiency Class AB:                                      13.2%            26.3%             39.4%

 

2.3    Push Pull CF Class AB Triode mode into 8 Ohms (Vp+g2 170V, Vg1 –30V, Ik 230mA)

No. of EL509 pairs/channel:                 1 pair             2 pairs             3 pairs

Pdiss tot (incl. heater):                               103.5W         207W             310.5W

Pout Class AB:                                            9.6W            38.5W             86.5W

[Pout Class A:                                             0.85W          3.4W               7.6W]

Efficiency Class AB:                                  9.3%             18.6%             27.9%

 

A Tentative Push-Pull Circuit to Try

This is a so-called Circlotron circuit. The main supplies (B+ no 1 and 2) must be connected as shown and not touch ground anywhere. Similarly, neither speaker terminal must be grounded! Each EL509 grid has its own 1uF/100k combo, bias circuit is common. Don’t forget grid- and gate-stoppers: 100-300R for small valves and 10-100k for ‘509s and MOSFETs (I'd use something like IRF710). For all versions, adjust NFB to exactly 10x/20dB. Keep the feedback voltage divider in the few-hundred-Ohms range. Calculate resistor power dissipation carefully, and double or triple to be safe (22k, 100 Ohm, and 1 Ohm are 3W). The 100 Ohms are just there to keep the amp happy if the series FB resistor is removed for open-loop measuring. The FET voltage divider can have 1 megohm resistors. Current sources as in the above SE amp. The power supply (see below) must be substantial, but need not be regulated.

           

For a Futterman-type alternative, see Tube CAD Journal, Jan 2000, pp 17-20.

 

Screen Connection Details

   

A quieter Triode mode can be accomplished by connecting up as in 2 but grounding the lower ends of the parallel resistor and capacitor instead of tying them to the output. Don't forget to heat-sink the FETs!

Other Details

Suggested Configurations 

For all: V2 = 5965; B+ no 3 ~300V; CS1 14.5mA, CS2 10mA, CS3 20mA

1 pair           Rout: ~2.5 Ohms        Sensitivity: ~0.5V        B -: min. -25V

2 pairs          Rout ~1.2 Ohms        Sensitivity: ~0.7V        B -: min. -40V

3 pairs          Rout ~0.8 Ohms        Sensitivity: ~0.9V        B -: min. -55V

4 pairs          Rout ~0.6 Ohms        Sensitivity: ~1.2V        B -: min. -65V

Set quiescent for each '509 to I=33/Vp-k maximum. E.g., 33/150V=0.22A (0.22V across 1-Ohm plate resistor). Less is safer and may prolong valve life. Also check that screen dissipation is not exceeded (Imax=7/Vg2-k). E.g., 7/190=36.8mA, i.e. 3.68V max across 100-Ohm screen resistor.

Comment on all the above amp suggestions

Power output estimates above are theoretical; they may be a bit optimistic, yet shouldn’t be absurdly wrong (as this isn’t a product advertising campaign – oops, sorry!). Quiescent current is pretty much "maxed out" in the examples in order to extract as much Class A power as possible – AB output power will be the about same if you turn quiescent down, but distortion may increase a bit. It might not be necessary (or even advisable) to set the current this high in the push-pull amps, especially if multiple parallel PP pairs are used; idle consumption will be great and so will cost, as one may need to change output valves more frequently. One might like to make quiescent adjustable and experiment with different settings to see where it sounds best. A more scientific approach is to measure for lowest distortion open-loop with an 8 Ohm load resistor as you tweak the bias. The amps should perform well open-loop but will of course have very high sensitivity, be noisy, and suffer a bit from uneven frequency response in this state with most real speakers connected due to the typically varying speaker load. Always test with a junk speaker for a good while before connecting up your precious ones! 

A note on EL509/519 

   EL509 and EL519 are virtually identical in electrical characteristics. The 519 has a slightly higher plate (40W) and screen (9W) rating than the 509 (35 and 7W, resp.). The PL509/40KG6 is a 40-volt heater version of the EL509. These are often cheaper, so if you don't mind using a 40V transformer for the heaters (and why should you?), you might just as well use the PL version. No sonic differences whatsoever.
   Whether you use new or used samples, you could make sure they are OK by pulse testing them at Vp = 100, Vg2 = 190, Vg1 = -40V. Apply Vg1 = 0V for a second or so, to get a rough reading, or you may destroy the valve. They should preferably pass ca 1400 mA. A stiff PSU is needed for this test, so the best place to test may be your finished amplifier. 
   There is little point in ordering matched valves, IMHO. The valves may need several hours of run-in to settle down, so it's a better idea to acquire more valves than you need, and match by swapping the valves around  in the amp after running it for a bit, until you have a fair balance of cathode currents.

 

Addenda 

26/4 2002:
I have recently experimented with toroid autotransformers between my speakers and my various power amps. This is a tapped single-coil choke/transformer hybrid that "steps up" the speaker's impedance in order to better fit a valve output stage by improving the power transfer (voltage/ current ratio). This affords much increased output power or fewer output valves at the expense of a somewhat greater voltage swing ability (which means that some of the above amp examples, esp. the SEs, would need higher voltages to realise increased power). 
   An "autoformer" of this kind has a wider bandwidth and seems to be more transparent than a typical OPT transformer in the same price range, probably due to its low conversion ratio, a single winding, no idle current through the winding (the output must be at ground potential at idle), and the fact that it is driven by a potent, low-impedence CF. A somewhat shocking finding was that my no-NFB transistor amp benefited from the autotransformers as well!
   The devices I am using, called ZEROs and devised by Paul Speltz, are described on this page. They have an impressive bandwidth of 2Hz-1MHz or 3Hz-2MHz, depending on which taps are used. [It is possible that ordinary mains toroids could be used with satisfactory results in this application, but I haven't investigated this possibility.]

18/5 2002:
I've added a table showing the numerous hookup possibilities of the ZERO Autoformers to the Valvulations section.

23/7 2002:
My Circlotron OTL plans are now finally coming to a stage where I might begin thinking of the practical construction work, but it's going to be a while yet! Watch this space for further info - I might just upload the tentative schematics later this year.

28/1 2004: It's been a while! The OTLs are now under construction, but things are going a bit slow due to the considerable expense of the parts, and also due to other obligations taking time.

- Morgan L.

Home